By: David A. (Andy) Hall, Esq. – Elville and Associates – andy@elvilleassociates.com, 443-393-7696
Many times clients will come for an appointment with an elder law attorney because their spouse or parent is no longer able to communicate decisions about their health or person. This can be the result of a progressive condition such as Alzheimer’s disease, or from a sudden onset, such as a fall resulting in a traumatic brain injury (“TBI”). The consequence can be the same if the alleged disabled person (“ADP”) does not have a healthcare power of attorney (“POA”) or advance medical directive (“AMD”) in place. Many Americans do not have incapacity planning documents — which can result in a guardianship of the person situation.
A healthcare POA or AMD allows the person nominated to serve as the agent for the ADP. This means that the agent can make healthcare and other personal decisions for the person that is no longer able to communicate those decisions. The most common context is making decisions about healthcare matters, i.e., whether to select a certain course or treatment, or whether to decline treatment because the ADP has made their wishes known regarding when they no longer want treatment.
Without this document, then a loved one can make decisions for the ADP pursuant to the MARYLAND HEALTH CARE DECISIONS ACT as codified in MD. CODE, Health Gen. Art. §5–605. Where the ADP has not nominated a person, then after two physicians determine that the person can no longer make decisions for himself, then the following people may serve as surrogate (in priority of the order listed):
(i) A guardian for the patient, if one has been appointed;
(ii) The patient’s spouse or domestic partner;
(iii) An adult child of the patient;
(iv) A parent of the patient;
(v) An adult brother or sister of the patient; or
(vi) A friend or other relative of the patient who meets the requirements
Id. While this statutory recognition is great for ad hoc or crisis situations, it may not be a viable long term solution for clients. Sometimes the ADP’s illness will drive them to fight against decisions which are objectively being made in their best interests. Then the loved one in that situation will want the imprimatur of a court order.
The Circuit Court in the Maryland County where the ADP resides or is admitted to receive medical treatment is the proper venue for filing for a guardianship of the person and it has the authority to appoint a guardian. Md. Rule 10-201; Estates & Trusts § 13-704(a)(2). The Petition is the document whereby a client (through her attorney) requests that the court appoint someone as guardian. Among other basic informational items, the Petition will need to include: a description of less restrictive alternatives to guardianship of the person that have been attempted and failed; facts as to the need for a guardianship; and two certificates signed by medical doctors (or one can be signed be an licensed psychologist or licensed clinical social worker) attesting to the ADP’s need for a guardianship. The timing of the certificates is important as one needs to be completed within 21 days of filing the petition. A seasoned guardianship attorney will give you a checklist of the required documents and information in order for the Petition to be accepted by the Court.
The Petitioner (the one filing for guardianship of the person) has to meet the burden of proving that the ADP:
(i) Lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning his person
(ii) Because of any mental disability, disease, habitual drunkenness, or addiction to drugs, and
(iii) That no less restrictive form of intervention is available which is consistent with the person’s welfare and safety
Estates & Trusts § 13-705.
The Court will appoint an attorney for the ADP, and it is very likely that the court appointed attorney will be paid out of the ADP’s assets. For a married couple, this can mean that the two parties will be paying for both sets of attorney’s fees. It can seem counter-intuitive to have to pay for an attorney to fight against you, but a guardianship of the person seeks to take away the inalienable right of self-determination regarding one’s person. A court will not do so lightly.
Consult with your fiduciary litigation attorney to go over the options regarding a loved one who can no longer make decisions for themselves and has not executed incapacity planning documents. If you have not already done so, then consult with an estate planning attorney to prepare for incapacity. It is truly a case where, as Benjamin Franklin said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”
Authored by: Olivia Holcombe-Volke, Esq. –
Elville and Associates
443-393-7696
olivia@elvilleassociates.com
The Maryland Statutory Power of Attorney (MSPOA) is a literal creature of statute – it is in a form that is set forth by Maryland Estates and Trust Code Section 17-202. It is statutorily mandated to be accepted by receiving institutions – if wrongly rejected, the statute provides for penalties and attorney’s fees. It is short, succinct, and in a form that is, verbatim, set forth in the statute. If a client were to choose to only sign one version of a Power of Attorney, it is this one that we recommend.
However, it is our practice to also provide a Durable General Power of Attorney (DGPOA), which is more comprehensive, and covers powers ranging from the Power to Fund Trusts, to the Power to Provide for Recreation and Travel. Importantly, it provides the Power to Gift, which is an important power for an Agent to have on behalf of a Principal in many Medicaid asset protection strategies. The Maryland Statutory Power of Attorney does not provide for the Power to Gift, and, without the explicit provision of this power, its availability is extremely questionable/limited (some would argue nonexistent). It is our practice and advice that utilizing the Durable General Power of Attorney as a supplement to the Maryland Statutory Power of Attorney serves as an additional, powerful tool for a trusted Agent to act on behalf of and protect the Principal.
For more information, please call 443-393-7696 or complete the form below.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
How an Inheritance May Affect A Special Needs Trust
By Lindsay V.R. Moss, Esq. — lindsay@elvilleassociates.com
A Special Needs Trust is an important estate planning tool for persons with disabilities. A Special Needs Trust can allow for a disabled person to continue to receive public benefits while retaining a source of funds to pay for extra services and programs that government benefits do not cover. A Special Needs Trust can be set up by the disabled person, family member or court system to “hold” an inheritance. If the disabled person received an inheritance outright, said inheritance would be considered an asset, thus possibly disqualifying the disabled person from receiving needs-based public benefits. A Special Needs Trust will hold the assets in the trust, which is not controlled by the disabled person, thereby allowing the continuation of receipt of public benefits. The trust can pay for supplemental needs for the disabled person, including personal care services, dental expenses, vacations and travel, and many other needs and services that are not provided by public benefits. Contact Elville & Associates to find out more about estate planning for an individual with special needs.
For more information, please call 443-393-7696 or complete the form below.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
By: Matthew F. Penater, J.D., LL.M. — matt@elvilleassociates.com
For those of us who have established a trust, are a beneficiary of a trust, or are considering implementing a trust into our estate plan, the recent changes in trust income tax rates warrants our attention. If a trust is in existence, a review of the trust terms is recommended for the reasons outlined in this article. For trust accounting purposes, a trust consist of two components: Principal and Income. Simply put, Principal consists of the assets used to fund the trust, and Income consists of earnings on those assets (dividends, interest, etc.). However, an important deviation from this concept is the treatment of capital gain on the sale of assets – this is considered Principal, even though under the Internal Revenue Code, it is taxable income. So, we have taxable income in the form of capital gain, which is Principal, and taxable income in the form of dividends/interest, which is Income. These are the conceptual inconsistencies that send a non-professional trustee into a tail-spin.
The vast majority of trusts in existence are drafted in a way that results in the following:
•
If Income (dividends/interest) is distributed to a beneficiary during any given year, that beneficiary must report that Income on the beneficiary’s individual income tax return in that year and then personally pay the income tax thereon; and
•
If Principal (which could include capital gain) is distributed to a beneficiary during any given year, that beneficiary DOES NOT report that capital gain on his or her individual income tax return – instead, the trust reports the capital gain on the trust’s income tax return and pays the income tax thereon from the assets of the trust.
The foregoing result is due to several factors, including the language of the trust and the Internal Revenue Code. This result worked fine as generally speaking, there was no more income tax being paid by the trust than would have been paid by the beneficiary. However, the changes to the tax treatment of trusts resulting from the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 has caused trusts to start paying much higher rates of tax in most cases. I promised myself I would keep this article simple and generally non-technical. So, without getting into the nitty-gritty, I can summarize the tax effect as follows: a married individual will pay the highest capital gain rate of 23.8% capital gains (which includes net investment income tax) once that married couple’s combined income reaches $457,600 for 2015; a trust will pay that same 23.8% capital gains rate once the trust has taxable income of only $12,300 for 2015. This means in general, capital gain taxed within a trust will be subject to substantially more income tax than if that same capital gain were passed out to a beneficiary and taxed to that beneficiary.
The problem is that most trusts today are not drafted to allow for the trustee to pass out the capital gain to the beneficiary, in the trustee’s discretion. There are Income Tax Regulations which provide for mechanisms on how to pass the capital gain out to a beneficiary if the terms of the trust do not address it, but those Regulations are complex and can be difficult to satisfy. The best solution is to give a trustee the discretion to allocate capital gain to a beneficiary within the trust document. The tax savings can be significant. A review of existing trust documents is the first place to start.
For more information, please call 443-393-7696 or complete the form below.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
A Primer on Guardianship — An Introduction
By: David A. (Andy) Hall, Esq., andy@elvilleassociates.com
Potential clients will often come into our office because their loved one is no longer able to manage their financial affairs or health care decisions due to a disabling event or disease. One study suggests that nearly two-thirds of Americans do not have incapacity planning documents. When the disabled person does not have the proper planning documents in place (at minimum, an advance medical directive and financial power of attorney), then their loved ones are unable to make the necessary medical and financial decisions on their behalf. Often the next step for those clients is to file for guardianship of their loved one.
Many clients are often dismayed that guardianship is not a simple process. A husband will often believe that they will naturally be appointed as guardian for his disabled wife without much fuss, but the process may be much more complicated. First, the court will appoint an attorney for the “alleged disabled person”. That term of art is important because it underlines why the courts are very particular in how guardianships proceed. It is up to the “Petitioner”, the one seeking guardianship, to prove that the alleged disabled person (“ADP”) lacks the capacity to make decisions for him or herself. The court wants to make sure that the ADP indeed lacks the capacity prior to taking away that person’s rights.
The court-appointed attorney will meet with her client and ask if they wants to contest the guardianship. The ADP’s answer is critical to how the case unfolds. Sometimes this answer is driven by the ADP’s underlying medical condition and sometimes they refuse to believe that they cannot handle the decisions for themselves as they have always done. If they want to contest the guardianship, then it will proceed like a normal civil case where both parties engage in discovery and the process culminates in a trial. The ADP has a right to a trial by jury or can elect a bench trial (where the judge makes the final decision).
The process may become more complicated if someone else seeks to be appointed guardian as well. This often arises where two siblings battle over who best would care for mom or dad when they are disabled. It is possible for the litigation to be fought between three or more litigants with all sides fighting hard.
Having the right guardianship attorney on your side will help you navigate this complex area of law. It can be maddening to have to fight so hard just to help your loved one, but it’s the unfortunate side of when the proper planning documents are not in place prior to the disabling event or disease.
Estate Planning Vocabulary
By: Olivia R. Holcombe-Volke, olivia@elvilleassociates.com
Estate planning documents frequently contain vocabulary that is specific to the field of estate planning, and not commonly used by the world at large. The following list, while not comprehensive of all of the confusing or unfamiliar terms within the estate planning context, are some of the words or concepts on which I have heard the most frequent questions:
HIPAA: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. This law, in part, is the privacy law that prevents healthcare workers or facilities from (among other things) sharing information contained in any part of your medical record or payment history with anyone else (with a few exceptions). This term arises in estate planning in the context of an Advance Medical Directive, where you are given the option of waiving the HIPAA privacy protections as to any person you name as a potential Agent.
Power of Attorney vs. Attorney-in-Fact: A Power of Attorney is a document, where you, as the Principal, give power of attorney to your Attorney-in-Fact (also known as your Agent).
Dispositive: Most commonly used in the phrase “dispositive provisions,” this word is the adjective form of the verb “dispose” (and of the noun “disposition”). It means that the language after it is dealing with how you wish to dispose of whatever it is you are referring to – so, in the context of a Will or Trust, how you wish to dispose of your property.
Ademption: If your Will or Trust says that at your death, you wish for your diamond tennis bracelet to go to your Aunt Sue, and, at your death, there is no diamond tennis bracelet in your ownership/estate, the gift to Aunt Sue “adeems,” and Aunt Sue can’t come after your estate with any sort of claim of wrongdoing.
Remote Contingent Distribution: Where does your estate go if all of the people you’ve named to receive it are gone at your death – if they have all predeceased you? This is a highly unlikely – a “remote” possibility – and one that will only occur IF all of your named beneficiaries are gone (it is “contingent” upon that) – but it is a remote contingent possibility that should be addressed in your Will or Trust, just in case.
Personal Representative: A Personal Representative is also known as an Executor. This is the title of the person (or corporate fiduciary) who will administer an estate under a Will.
Trustee: This is the title of the person (or corporate fiduciary) who will administer a Trust.
Interested vs. Independent trustee: An Interested Trustee is, in the simplest terms, a related or subordinate party to the beneficiary of the Trust, or to the grantor of the Trust. An Independent Trustee is not an Interested Trustee.
Well-written estate planning documents will often contain a section for definitions, given the reality of there being so many terms of art. Regardless, a good estate planning attorney should be your primary and best resource for understanding what it is that your estate planning documents actually say, so that you will know that your dispositive provisions are going to be properly administered by your Personal Representative or Trustee even in the event of a Remote Contingent Distribution.
For more information, please call 443-393-7696 or complete the form below.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
Navigating Social Security Disability
By: Barrett R. King, Esq.
barrett@elvilleassociates.com
Social Security Disability Insurance “pays benefits to you and certain members of your family if you are ‘insured,’ meaning that you worked long enough and paid Social Security taxes.”1 In order to have worked “long enough,” you must have forty ‘credits’. One credit is earned for every $1,220 in wages or self-employment income up to a maximum of four credits per year. In addition, twenty of your total credits must have been earned in the last ten years before you become disabled. Benefits are available for widows and for disabled children who cannot or will not earn credits on their own and such individuals may ‘piggyback’ on the credits of working spouses or parents. For purposes of this article, however, we will focus on a worker that applies for benefits.
“Disability” comes with its own definition for purposes of receiving Social Security benefits. You are considered disabled for Social Security purposes if you (1) cannot do work that you did before, (2) cannot adjust to other work, and (3) your disability has or will last at least one year. If you possess enough credits and you feel you meet these criteria for disability, you may apply to the Social Security Administration for Disability Insurance.
In 2014, the Washington Post published an article by David A. Fahrenthold titled “The Biggest Backlog In the Federal Government.”2 The story highlighted the fact that nearly (and, as of this writing, more than) one million applications at one office for Social Security Disability were pending review.3 In addition, Fahrenthold explained, applicants for disability benefits are waiting an average of 435 days for a decision on their application.4 And this is after the cases have been denied at the application stage (twice, as readers will see) and are waiting for a judge to hear the applicants’ plea their cause.
In representing many clients who are approaching retirement or who have disabled children who qualify for various public benefits, this writer has gained a wealth of knowledge about navigating Social Security and it was only a matter of time before the opportunity arose to help a client pursue disability benefits.
Over the years, the firm has assisted dozens if not hundreds of individuals through the process of seeking disability benefits from Social Security. Unfortunately, much of what the Washington Post article says is true. Routinely, cases languish in the various stages of the process for over a year and, in more than one example, exceed two or even three years before resolution.
What we have found is that clients are much better served by hiring an attorney to help them apply from the beginning. Many clients come to us after their initial application is denied. Nine times out of ten, we find that the client overstated their ability to perform certain tasks (via a form called the Disability Report which is filed with the application) such as basic chores and personal care. Simply put, no one likes to admit that they cannot do things like dress themselves, clean, cut grass, cook, or even leave the house without assistance. It is our nature to want to be independent and self-sufficient. Faced with admitting the reality – in writing, no less – applicants will tell Social Security they need “just a little help” or that they “can do a little bit of laundry with no problem.”
You are not getting any awards from Social Security for slogging through these tasks despite pain or limitation, so why are you not being perfectly honest about it? If you were once able to prepare an elaborate meal for a party of eight but are now limited to preparing a sandwich on your own before you have to sit down, tell Social Security. The award you are after is the benefit of the insurance you have paid for over your working years, so relay the facts in the way that best explains what your injury or sickness has done to you. The only way the examiner can understand your experience is if you describe it accurately. The medical records only tell what others perceive. Your application is your chance to tell the subjective truth.
Many times, even if you file an application that appears to show that you are disabled, the application is denied because Social Security believes you were hurt or are sick, but that you can return to work or that you can perform a job different than the one you left. These cases go through several levels of appeal, the first being the Request for Reconsideration. This is the stage where most cases are referred to us for help.
The Request for Reconsideration is, at its most simple, a second look at your first application along with any updated information you provide. The review is not much different than the initial application, though Social Security may send you to a doctor of their choosing for an examination.
If your application fails at this stage, you can request a hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). There are more than 1,400 ALJs who hear these appeals. Appeals are heard either by video conference (where the applicant sits in a room with a court reporter while the judge is present on a video screen from a remote location) or by in-person hearing, the latter usually occurring if the applicant lives in or near a major metropolitan area. From there, applicants who are denied have one more option: the Appeals Council, which adds another year of waiting to the whole process.
Clients who become disabled and go through this process are often waiting for a decision with no other source of income. This is a major reason why we recommend clients work with an attorney from the outset, so that your best foot is put forward in the hope of obtaining a favorable decision sooner rather than much, much later.
1 http://www.ssa.gov/disability/
2
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2014/10/18/the-biggest-backlog-in-the-federal-government/
3 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/national/breaking-points/#backlog
4 Id.
By: Stephen R. Elville, J.D., LL.M.
Portability represents the single biggest change in the estate tax laws since the implementation of the unlimited marital deduction in 1981. Understanding the mathematical import of Portability as the numbers relate to you and your estate plan could have huge financial implications for your heirs – an impact just as significant, if not more so, than any previous tax planning routinely done (marital deduction planning) prior to the advent of Portability. What is Portability? It is the ability of a surviving spouse to utilize the unused estate tax exemption of his or her deceased spouse by filing a timely federal estate tax return (Form 706). Practically speaking, the personal representative (executor) of the deceased spouse’s estate chooses whether to utilize the estate tax exclusion amount of the deceased spouse ($5,430,000 in 2015) in the decedent spouse’s estate, or transfer the deceased spouse’s unused exclusion amount (DSUE) to the surviving spouse. For estates equal to or exceeding the exclusion amount, there is no forgiveness and therefore no extension of time allowed to file the federal estate tax return. However, for estates valued at less than the exclusion amount, an extension of time may be allowed. The basic exclusion amount is indexed for inflation and is scheduled to increase to $6 million by 2020, assuming no change in the current laws. However, the DSUE is not indexed for inflation and its value is frozen upon election.
Portability is, first and foremost, about taxes – about an analysis of estate tax versus income tax implications. Portability concerns itself with the more human elements of planning (i.e. spousal control, spendthrift protection, bloodline control, etc.) only to the extent that these considerations are consequential to the numerical tax analysis of the Portability concept.
Portability was designed for married couples with estates of $5 million or less, and for married couples with estates of two exclusion amounts or less, all of whom wish to simplify the planning process, minimize tax reporting, lower the cost of administration, and streamline tax election concerns. However, for couples with combined estates exceeding two exclusion amounts (currently $10,860,000), mathematical analysis indicates that the traditional estate tax planning additional advantages begin to outweigh and eclipse the income tax and other ‘advantages” of Portability (discussed below).
Portability-type planning involves several choices, most of which include leaving assets to your surviving spouse in a manner that qualifies for the unlimited marital deduction (the ability for married couples to leave assets to the surviving spouse with no tax, with the consequence that those assets are then taxed in the estate of the surviving spouse), thereby achieving a step up in basis (new cost basis) not only the death of the first spouse, but also on the death of the second spouse – a double cost basis adjustment and avoidance of income tax upon receipt of your heirs (except for retirement assets, savings bonds, and other items of income in respect to a decedent). This means that for the first time in history, couples can leave unprecedented amounts to each other and to their beneficiaries estate tax free, and to the maximum extent possible, income tax free.
It is important to note that in the Portability versus traditional planning analysis, even where all due diligence is performed in the planning process, mathematical outcomes are ultimately dependent on how long the surviving spouse lives and the future rate of return on assets.
There are several approaches to planning in light of portability, including the following: (1) leave everything (100%) to the surviving spouse; (2) leave everything (100%) to a bypass trust (a trust controlled by the deceased spouse and taxed in the deceased spouse’s estate; (3) leave everything (100%) to a bypass trust but with the ability of a special fiduciary such as a trust protector or independent special trustee to grant a general power of appointment so that assets can pass by marital deduction if necessary or desirable; (4) leave everything (100%) to a QTIP trust or a Clayton QTIP trust; (5) leave everything (100%) to the surviving spouse where he or she then makes a large gift for purposes of immediately utilizing the DSUE amount (the DSUE, if elected, is used first prior to the surviving spouse’s basic exclusion amount); or (6) an approach combining one or more of the above. While all the above methods allow the surviving spouse to transfer or “port” their deceased spouse’s DSUE, the bypass trust approaches (numbers 2 and 3) are not true Portability-type plans due to the fact that any assets trapped in a bypass trust and not ultimately passing to the surviving spouse by marital deduction receive only one step up in basis (cost basis adjustment) at the death of the first spouse, the gain within the bypass trust being later subject to income taxation at the death of the surviving spouse.
In practical terms, Portability planning is about a married couple deciding on the best way to deal with the transfer of assets from one spouse to the other at the death of the first spouse. Unless the spouses wish to exercise a higher level of control over the transferred assets in further trust for the benefit of the survivor to include remarriage restrictions; or, alternatively, the spouses desire that the transferred assets be held in trust not only for the benefit of the surviving spouse, but also for the benefits of descendants; or unless the combined taxable estate of both spouses exceeds two basic exclusion amounts, then one of the “purely” Portability-type planning options outlined above would be appropriate.
Maryland will adopt Portability in 2019 when it adopts the current federal estate tax structure. Until then, many Maryland residents will continue some form of bypass trust planning to deal with Maryland estate planning, as Maryland remains one of the only states in the U.S. with a state estate tax and an inheritance tax. With a combined income tax rate of 29.55%, Maryland is also one of the states with a disparity between the federal estate tax rate of 40% and state long-term capital gains rates, making the decision to defer and avoid income taxes to the maximum extent possible through Portability planning a worthwhile and important endeavor.
It is important to understand the mathematics of Portability. An understanding of your tax planning objective(s) is key – are you planning to avoid estate tax and income tax to the maximum extent possible? Or, do other non-tax planning issues take precedence? Either planning focus is fine – so long as you know which one you have and why you are doing it.
For more information, please call 443-393-7696 or complete the form below.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
By: Matthew F. Penater, Esq.
matthew@elvilleassociates.com
As a Business Succession attorney, I have the opportunity to see into the internal operations of businesses, especially all the legal-related problems business owners encounter. The most common issues I see have to do with improper financial reporting and tax reporting. But, I see any number of additional issues — from employee management to personal problems between business partners. Although I can’t offer solutions to every problem today’s business owner faces, here are 5 preventative actions every business should employ:
- Have bank account dedicated exclusively to the business. Many sole proprietors tend to use their own personal bank accounts or they run personal expenses through a business account. Don’t do it! Have a business bank account and business credit card, which are only used for the business. Come tax time and financial reporting time, you don’t need to waste hours culling out personal transactions and risk losing in an audit if you missed some.
- Have a dedicated email account for the business with subfolders for particular items/accounts. Managing your email these days is an absolute must. How often have you had to search back through old emails (business and personal) for that one receipt or contract? Make sure all business emails flow through your business account. Clear out emails daily by moving them to the relevant subfolder for easy retrieval at a later date if needed. Examples of subfolders are “Billing”, “Orders”, “Personnel”, etc.
- Have your corporate records in place. If you are a corporation in the State of Maryland, you are required to have Bylaws in place, along with initial appointments of Directors and Officers. A corporation is also required to hold annual meetings. Ensure these documents are in place and annual meetings are properly documented. They might not seem important until you need them and don’t have them – for example when the corporation applies for a line of credit and the bank asks for the documentation.
- Have an employee handbook. This is self-explanatory. Ensure you and your employees understand their roles, rights, and responsibilities.
- Ensure your taxes are in order. Nothing and I mean nothing puts the breaks on a business like bad tax reporting. No one likes paying taxes, but that’s the cost of doing business. If you are out of your depth, hire an accountant so the taxes are correct. Better to pay a little more now to a good accountant than a lot more to the IRS later.
For more information, please call 443-393-7696 or complete the form below.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
By: Olivia R. Holcombe-Volke, Esq.
olivia@elvilleassociates.com
In a well-drafted Last Will and Testament or Revocable Living Trust for a single person, there will be at least one provision that addresses how long a beneficiary must survive the testator to be deemed to have survived the testator, and, thereby, to be able to inherit under the Will or Trust. In a well-drafted Last Will and Testament or Revocable Living Trust for a married person, there will be at least two provisions that address situations in which the order of death (or survivorship) matters – the one that deals with a beneficiary’s ability to inherit, as mentioned above, as well as a provision that deals specifically with a simultaneous death scenario, whereby both spouses die simultaneously.
Why does it matter?
In the case of addressing how long a beneficiary must survive the testator in order to receive their inheritance, the reasoning is two-fold. For one thing, it is usually the testator’s intention that the particular beneficiary receive the use and enjoyment of the inherited property – not the beneficiaries of the beneficiary’s estate. Therefore, one way to avoid a situation where X leaves property to Y, and Y dies one week after X, leaving Y’s property to Z, and now Z gets to enjoy X’s property – property that X intended for Y – is to have a survivorship requirement built in, such that Y doesn’t inherit unless Y survives X for a certain amount of time. It doesn’t avoid the risk completely, but it at least helps to minimize it. The other reason for setting forth a survivorship requirement (customarily 60-90 days) is to avoid the expense and effort that would be necessary to figure out who gets what in a circumstance where there aren’t clearly LIVING beneficiaries to inherit.
In the case of addressing the simultaneous death scenario, whereby both spouses die in a common accident, the reasoning is again two-fold. First, there is the desire to avoid the need to probate two estates simultaneously within one marriage. Second, there is the opportunity to dictate that the less wealthy spouse survived the wealthier spouse, which may be beneficial for tax purposes and other financial considerations. The method for achieving this is simply to include a provision that says if both spouses die simultaneously, spouse X will be deemed to have survived spouse Y.
The inclusion of survivorship language in a testamentary document is not meant by the testator to be harsh or restrictive. Its purposes are for dictating what happens in the event of certain rare, unpredictable situations – for maintaining control over what happens to one’s estate in the face of an unlikely situation.
For more information, please call 443-393-7696 or complete the form below.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
Connect with us
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- November 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
